The IRS has given an employee worker wrongly classified as an independent contractor a very loud whistle to blow and employers the means to obtain an advance determination of worker classification to avoid future disputes and tax liabilities.
When is a worker an employee or an independent contractor for federal income tax purposes? Disputes over employee or independent contractor classification frequently arise and the outcome is usually very important to one and very expensive for the other. Mistakes are sometimes made, but more often, employers will incorrectly classify an employee as an independent contractor for several reasons. The most common reason is to avoid the payment of the employer’s portion of employment taxes (usually about 7.5% of gross). The second reason is to avoid the preparation and filing of quarterly 941 employment tax returns. Another reason is to avoid making employment tax deposits. Sometimes, employers may not understand the legal and tax difference between an employee or independent contractor and classify the worker in whatever way the worker suggests.
A worker who should be classified as an employee may want to be treated as an independent contractor so that payroll taxes and federal income taxes are not withheld from his or her earnings. More common is the situation where a worker who is classified as an independent contractor wants to be treated as an employee so that more of his or her earnings are reported to the Social Security Administration. The more income reported as earned, the higher the monthly retirement benefit. In certain trades and businesses, such as construction, landscaping, housekeeping, janitorial, farming, ranching, fishing, repair and maintenance-where workers traditionally earn piecemeal or by the job and are often unskilled and less educated –the worker simply has no choice as to whether they are classified as an employee or as an independent contractor.
The IRS provides Form SS-8 -Determination of Worker Status for Purposes of Federal Employment Taxes and Income Tax Withholding– for use by an employer when the employer is not sure how to classify a worker. Upon submission of the SS-8, the IRS will make an advance determination of how the worker should be classified, which gives the employer a safe harbor if the worker ever complains or if the wrong classification is made.
In addition, the IRS provides Form 8819– Uncollected Social Security and Medicare Tax on Wages- to a worker who believes that his or her employment classification is incorrect. Form 8819 is the big, loud and often very expensive whistle, that when submitted with Form SS-8, alerts the IRS to a possible improper classification and permits the employer’s portion of social security and medicare taxes to be credited in advance to the worker’s social security record.
If the IRS ultimately agrees that the whistle blowing worker has been misclassified, the actions of the employer will be carefully scrutinized. An employer who improperly classifies an employee as an independent contractor may be subjected to an audit. The books and records of the employer will be examined and workers may be questioned. In addition to an after the fact assessment of the employer’s portion of employment taxes, the employer who misclassifies a worker or workers may be subjected to ordinary civil failure to deposit, failure to file and failure to pay when due (delinquency) penalties, the more serious civil fraud penalty and the most serious of all, a federal crime. None of these outcomes are good for business, even in the best of times.
If you are an employer that is unsure of how to classify a worker, that has discovered certain workers have been misclassified, or that has intentionally misclassified workers, seek legal assistance immediately. If you are a worker who believes that he or she has been misclassified and wants some recourse, don’t wait to blow the whistle.
The area of worker classification can be very confusing. Mistakes are common. Misclassification of worker status to keep costs low or for exploitative purposes frequently happen. The law firm of Peter G. Milne, P.C. is here to help. Don’t wait until its too late. Contact us right now.




Texas HB 11 Sales Tax Audits Successful for Auditor, Disaster for Retailer
Beginning on January 1, 2008, the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts was given a very powerful and effective sales tax auditing tool by the Texas Legislature. The Criminal Investigation Division of the Comptroller’s Office recently published the following post on its website.
“Passed during the 80th Legislative Session in 2007, HB 11 dramatically increased the Comptroller’s ability to identify, audit and, when appropriate, prosecute retailers who are collecting sales tax but not remitting the proper amount to the state.
HB 11 amended the Alcoholic Beverage Code and the Tax Code to require distributors and wholesalers who make sales of ale, beer, wine, cigarettes, cigars and tobacco products to Texas retailers to report those sales monthly to the Comptroller’s office. Those distributors and wholesalers are also required now to report that data electronically, unless inability to do so is shown.
HB 11 data, which has now been collected since January 2008, allows the Comptroller to compare the purchases that retailers have made of these products with the sales that retailers are required to report. Because both sets of data are largely received electronically, discrepancies can be more easily and rapidly identified. Rapid identification is essential so that the Comptroller auditors can begin their work to mitigate and recoup the revenue loss to the state. The Comptroller’s office identified almost $90 million due to the state in fiscal year 2009 and more than $102 million due to the state in fiscal year 2010. To date in fiscal year 2011, more than $59 million has been identified.
In some cases, audit documentation may suggest that the taxpayer had criminal intent to evade taxes. If so, the case will be reviewed and evaluated by the Criminal Investigations Division for the possible filing of criminal charges.”
Small convenience store retailers of alcohol and tobacco products have been flooding my office in recent months with sales tax audit determinations which clearly show the effectiveness of an audit based upon HB 11 reporting. The Comptroller has been consistent in proposing a 50% penalty in addition to the 10% penalty permitted by law. In some cases, the Comptroller will agree to drop the 50% penalty in exchange for a settlement, but only if the taxpayer has timely petitioned for an audit redetermination.
If a store has closed and the auditor cannot conduct an in-store “shelf test” or if the taxpayer cannot or will not produce actual daily sales documentation sufficient for the auditor to determine a markup on alcohol or tobacco products, the auditor is instructed to use certain percentages for alcohol and tobacco markups. In addition, the auditor is instructed to use a certain percentage to obtain a “product mix” of alcohol and tobacco products as compared to taxable non-alcohol and tobacco products. A very small percentage is allowed for spoilage and theft. Once these factors are applied, a sales tax estimate is calculated and compared against the sales tax reported by the taxpayer.
In the case of all audits presented by potential clients, the taxable sales estimate, which has been derived by formula and upon which the sales tax deficiency is calculated, is significantly higher than the taxable sales amounts reported by the taxpayer.
The best way to defeat an sales tax audit based upon Texas HB 11 data is to keep good records and accurately report taxable sales. However, if record keeping or reporting proves to be a problem, the audit may be attacked administratively or at hearing in several different ways.
If you are a retailer facing a significant sales tax increase as proposed by a sales tax audit, call my office before the audit begins, or as soon as you receive the audit determination letter. Do not make any admissions to the auditor or agree to anything after the audit determination letter has been issued. If a request for an administrative redetermination or a hearing is not timely made, the results to the taxpayer are usually disastrous!
One needs an attorney experienced in sales tax audits and hearings to level the playing field. Call for a consultation now!